Elizabeth Jenkins, Alaska's Energy Desk - Juneau

Yellow cedar is dying. Can Southeast Alaska sawmills profit?

A dead stand of yellow cedar on West Chichagof-Yakobi Wilderness in Southeast Alaska. (Photo courtesy of Lauren Oakes)

Yellow cedar is a commercially valuable tree species for the timber industry. It grows from California all the way to Southeast Alaska, but there are fewer living trees growing across the range because of climate change.

A recent study explores the business potential of salvage logging, or harvesting trees that are already dead. It sounds eco-conscious, like something that would be cataloged beside reclaimed wood. But Brian Buma, an ecologist with the University of Colorado, thinks that’s a stretch.

“I have to say, I really hate that term because dead trees are just as important to the ecosystem as live trees,” Buma said.

Buma is not totally opposed to logging, but he is concerned about the number of ways humans are contributing to yellow cedar’s decline. For example, through climate change.

Normally, snow helps insulate the trees’ roots, but rain combined with cold snaps can freeze yellow cedar roots, causing them to die. In total, about 7 percent of the species has died across its range.

“On one hand you don’t want people cutting down live yellow cedar because it’s dying,” Buma said. “So, we want to conserve it where it’s still alive. But on the other hand, you don’t want to take away a valuable resource in the community.”

Like Buma, the U.S. Forest Service also wondered about this new inventory of climate change killed trees. Southeast Alaska’s timber industry is struggling, and there’s been a long debate about whether or not the federal agency is doing enough to help it survive.

Past studies indicate yellow cedar that’s been dead for decades can be just as good for making stuff as living trees. (The species is famous for being resistant to rot.) So together, ecologists and foresters set up a task for five sawmills on Prince of Wales and Kupreanof Island. They wanted to know if lumber from dead trees worked as well in practice as it seemed to on paper.

On of the five sawmills used in the experiment was Kupreanof Lumber & Design, run by Kevin Merry. The Forest Service handled the fees for harvesting the dead yellow cedar, and Merry cut the trees along the road in Kake himself. He says the trees were spread out so harvesting them was labor and time intensive, and some of the yellow cedar was too degraded to mill, but he was still able to find markets.

“At that time, I sent a little bit of it down to the guy in Florida making turkey calls,” Merry said. “Some more of it was used by some wood carvers. Some of it ended up being firewood.”

In the end, Merry’s costs were higher than his gross revenue. But of the five mills in the experiment, three of them actually did OK.

Brian Buma says the results were kind of a mixed bag. Still, it proved you can make money on a species of dying trees.

“It’s not like this is suddenly going to support a bunch of new jobs,” Buma said. “This is just sort of a way to protect the species while doing some damage — but not a ton of damage — to the ecosystem.”

And Buma thinks that might be the marketing key to creating a high value product. For instance, beetle-killed pine, found in Western parts of the United States, has gained in popularity. Why not climate change killed wood? If that’s the story of our time, some people might want to own a piece of that.

“I think it’s interesting. I got laughed at when I told some of the folks in Southeast,” Buma said. “They thought that was silly.”

Still, Buma says he would be a potential customer.

There is at least one small sawmill in the region that makes guitar tops from salvage trees. They’ve even used dead yellow cedar for that. But they currently don’t have plans to expand that part of their business.

Alaska Forest Association names new executive director

The Ketchikan headquarters of Alcan Forest Products and Alaska Forest Association. (Photo by Elizabeth Jenkins/Alaska's Energy Desk)
The Ketchikan headquarters of the Alaska Forest Association. (Photo by Elizabeth Jenkins/Alaska’s Energy Desk)

The Alaska Forest Association has named a new executive director.

xx
(Photo courtesy of the Alaska Forest Association)

Tessa Axelson will help lead the Ketchikan-based timber industry group, which has long-advocated for logging jobs and less federal red tape preventing timber sales in the Tongass National Forest.

Axelson will be taking over the role from Owen Graham, who led the organization for close to 20 years. Graham will still be involved in some of the nonprofit’s initiatives.

Bert Burkhart, the group’s board president, said Axelson is a good fit because of her history communicating with the public. She previously worked at the Denali Commission, an independent federal agency that assists with infrastructure projects in rural Alaska.

Axelson begins work at the Alaska Forest Association in February.

 

State gives timber industry group $1.3M in federal money to work with US Forest Service

Clearcuts and old-growth forests are part of the view of Indian Valley on Prince of Wales Island.
Clearcuts and old-growth forests are part of the view of Indian Valley on Prince of Wales Island. (Creative Commons photo by Nick Bonzey)

An environmental group doesn’t think it’s fair that federal money was given to a timber industry group to assess trees that could be suitable for helicopter logging in the Tongass National Forest.

Documents obtained by Earthjustice show a contract between the state Division of Forestry and the Alaska Forest Association worth up to $1.3 million, or $260,000 a year, for a span of five years.

Olivia Glasscock, an associate attorney with Earthjustice, said it’s like paying an industry group to pick the trees it wants to harvest.

“I think it really just highlights the imbalance in how the public is getting to participate in these planning and management processes and how the industry is getting to participate in it,” she said.

But Chris Maisch, the director of the Alaska Division of Forestry, said that’s not the case. He helped oversee the contract. The Forest Service first granted the money to the state. He said both the Forest Service and the state are trying to gain more experience in selecting marketable trees.

Recently, Southeast Alaska’s only helicopter logging contractor stopped doing business. Maisch would like to see another company come online. And he said there needs to be a new generation of foresters who know how to facilitate that work; it makes sense the Alaska Forest Association, or AFA, would be helping with that.

The group has been around a long time.

“I wouldn’t agree that it’s AFA picking the trees,” Maisch said. “It’s actually a training process to identify the criteria to make the tree economic, and then it can be safely flown out.”

In an emailed statement, the Forest Service said, “The partnership implements the training and information exchange through training cadres made up of agency, industry, and other partners having the appropriate expertise.”

The location of some of this training has been hotly debated because it’s happening on land slated for a controversial timber sale.

Prince of Wales Island could be the location of the largest federal timber sale in Alaska in more than a decade. But the plans are being litigated in federal District Court.

The plaintiffs, including Earthjustice, say the Forest Service hasn’t provided a detailed map of the areas that could be logged, which makes it impossible for the public to weigh in on the environmental impact.

Earthjustice says it would like the Forest Service to end this grant “immediately.”

This story has been updated.

 

Site notifications
Update notification options
Subscribe to notifications