Energy & Mining

Above the Yukon River, on Native land, Hilcorp is set to drill for oil this summer

Rain falls along the Yukon River in the Yukon Flats region, where oil company Hilcorp is planning to drill exploration wells this summer. (Bathsheba Demuth)

Later this spring, barges of heavy equipment will pull away from a launch on Alaska’s road system and begin a journey up the Yukon River.

More than 100 miles upstream, a tributary, Birch Creek, branches off.

The equipment’s destination is along that creek, on remote property owned by Alaska Native corporations in a huge basin called the Yukon Flats.

There, an oil company will set up a specially designed rig to drill the basin’s first-ever deep wells, which the landowners hope could lead to the discovery of the state’s next big oil field.

If found, petroleum could create well-paying jobs for Yukon watershed residents and generate big dividend payments for the 20,500 shareholders of Doyon, the for-profit Native corporation for Alaska’s Interior region.

Doyon’s leaders describe the drilling effort as a rare opportunity — one that could deliver a lucrative resource sought from its lands for decades, though never produced.

But the campaign has engendered a broad backlash from tribal governments in the region.

Much of the opposition stems from the track record of the business that will be doing the drilling: Hilcorp, the large, privately held oil company founded by a Texas billionaire, Jeff Hildebrand.

Hilcorp has substantially increased its holdings in Alaska in recent years and now operates the massive Prudhoe Bay field on the state’s North Slope, where it partners with major firms like ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips.

A Hilcorp drilling rig operates on the shore of Cook Inlet, not far outside Anchorage. The company will use a different rig for its exploratory wells in the Yukon Flats this summer. (Nathaniel Herz/Northern Journal)

But it also has a history of leaks and accidents, prompting fears from Yukon watershed residents about the risks of its new drilling program.

“We’ve seen it so many times, that these big corporations come in and they take and take. They say they’re going to reinvest and it never happens,” said Rhonda Pitka, chief of the tribal government in Beaver, a Yukon River village some 20 miles downstream of the Birch Creek confluence. “What will we end up with at the end of all this?”

Whether the Yukon Flats will support commercial fossil fuel production remains highly uncertain, and likely won’t be known for years. More exploratory drilling will almost certainly be needed to better define a deposit even if Hilcorp finds evidence of petroleum this summer, and the infrastructure to extract and move it to market would require an array of environmental permits.

Even at this early stage, opponents are aggressively fighting the drilling plans. At a meeting last month, Interior Alaska’s consortium of 42 tribal governments, Tanana Chiefs Conference, approved a resolution against oil development by Hilcorp in the Yukon Flats, saying it’s too risky for the “ecologically and culturally significant region.”

But leaders of Birch Creek, the tiny Indigenous community closest to the drilling sites, have endorsed the effort, saying it could produce desperately needed jobs.

Birch Creek’s Native village corporation also owns some of the land where the drilling will take place, and like Doyon, it stands to benefit from a discovery.

“Without the economic activity this exploration project could create, Birch Creek and the other Yukon Flats villages may simply cease to exist, and our way of life will be lost forever,” the community’s tribal government said in a 2020 resolution endorsing the program. Birch Creek’s population is now just 30 people, and its school closed more than two decades ago because it had too few students, according to the state of Alaska.

The support from Birch Creek has given Doyon and Hilcorp the “social license to operate in that area,” Doyon’s chief executive, Aaron Schutt, said in an interview.

If oil is found, Doyon’s agreements with Hilcorp would require the company to hire shareholders and local residents, he added.

Aaron Schutt, Doyon’s chief executive, stands in his Anchorage office. (Nathaniel Herz/Northern Journal)

Schutt said that Doyon’s early leaders, a half-century ago, chose to claim land in the Yukon Flats specifically because of its potential to yield oil and gas.

“We can’t re-select. We can’t undo those deals that were done by our leaders 50 years ago,” he said. “We’re stuck with the hand we were dealt from 1972 to 1975. And we have to balance all of these various constituencies and opportunities and concerns, and do the best job that we can.”

Birch Creek leaders, through a Doyon official, declined to comment. Hilcorp released its own prepared statement saying it’s “excited to work with Doyon and community stakeholders to advance this meaningful exploration project in the Yukon Flats.”

“Together, we are developing a tailored program to responsibly evaluate the region’s energy and resource potential,” said spokesman Matt Shuckerow.

A geologic enigma

The Yukon Flats basin covers more than 10,000 square miles, bounded by the Brooks Range mountains to the north and the White Mountains to the south. The Yukon River sweeps across from east to west, and the trans-Alaska pipeline snakes over the land from north to south.

The basin began forming at least 60 million years ago, according to Marwan Wartes, a veteran geologist with the Alaska Department of Natural Resources.

It’s still sinking today, making it difficult to study. Often, petroleum-rich regions of the state have experienced uplift, producing rocky outcroppings that give glimpses of their geologic histories — but those clues aren’t present in the flats, Wartes said.

A United States Geological Survey map of the Yukon Flats. (USGS)

Experts suspect that the area contains sedimentary deposits that could produce natural gas, or even oil. But no one has drilled deep wells to confirm those theories, so the flats’ subsurface remains something of a geologic enigma.

“When I look at the whole map of Alaska, it always catches my eye, and I always am frustrated that we know so little about it — because it’s mostly burying itself,” Wartes said. “It is a mystery, and I think most geologists would agree to that.”

Today, the region, home to the Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge, is important habitat for as many as 2 million migratory ducks, as well as several species of fish. Its salmon and moose have long sustained the region’s Native people, who now live primarily in seven Indigenous villages within or near the refuge.

For nearly two centuries, the Yukon Flats have also been the source of global commodities — starting in the mid-1800s with furs, and continuing with the 1893 discovery of gold in Birch Creek.

The region has never produced oil; nearly all of Alaska’s petroleum comes from the other side of the Brooks Range, on the North Slope.

But Doyon and oil companies have long eyed the flats for its potential, dating back to the years after the 1971 Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act. That federal legislation terminated Indigenous land claims in the state by transferring some 10% of Alaska’s land to newly formed, Native-owned corporations — which, with certain limitations, could choose the land that they wanted.

Doyon, owned by Alaska Natives with ties to the Interior region, became the state’s largest private landowner.

Working at the time with smaller Indigenous-owned corporations connected to the region’s villages, Schutt said, Doyon selected additional land in the Yukon Flats, hoping that it would yield petroleum. The idea was to capture areas with oil potential while also leaving room for the region’s residents to continue their subsistence-based lifestyles.

A view of the Yukon River near the village of Beaver. (Bathsheba Demuth)

Doyon formalized that strategy, Schutt said, in agreements with five village corporations. A 1974 agreement with Beaver’s Indigenous-owned corporation refers to the “potential for oil and gas” in the area around the village, “the development of which would benefit all of the shareholders of Doyon.”

Pitka, Beaver’s current tribal chief, said that oil was not the driving force behind the village’s participation in the Doyon agreement.

“The village corporations picked land for subsistence,” Pitka said. “People were living on the land.”

In the years after the land deals, major oil companies prospected for oil in the Yukon Flats; Exxon even signed an exploration agreement with Doyon. But Exxon pulled out of the region after its major 1989 oil spill near Valdez.

Studies continued, however.

Doyon contractors have collected hundreds of sediment and soil samples throughout the basin. The corporation has also conducted seismic testing, and it collaborated with federal and state agencies that drilled a research well to a moderate depth in 2004. The United States Geological Survey has estimated that the Yukon Flats contain 173 million barrels of oil, with a smaller chance of as much as 600 million barrels.

“This has been a basin that’s been on everyone’s radar as having potential for a long, long time,” said Wartes.

Hilcorp’s involvement began in 2019, when it signed an exploration agreement with Doyon covering some 2,500 square miles of the Native corporation’s land.

Since then, Hilcorp has flown airborne surveys to gather geologic data, and it’s also drilled more than a dozen shallow test wells. Last year, it narrowed its focus, signing oil and gas leases with Doyon that cover 94 square miles near Birch Creek.

This kind of remote oil and gas exploration work, known as wildcatting, is not Hilcorp’s specialty; the company is better known for buying aging oil fields and making them more productive.

“They must see something that really captivates them, because there’s no shortage of oil on the North Slope,” said Phil Wight, an energy and environmental historian at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

Even Schutt, the Doyon chief executive, said he’s not sure exactly what’s driving Hilcorp’s interest.

“I actually don’t know the answer to that,” he said. “It’s still kind of a mystery.”

A big upside for Doyon

This summer, Hilcorp plans to drill two exploration wells on separate sites.

The company has not publicly announced its plans, but some details have trickled into public view through documents submitted to the state. Hilcorp’s drilling effort requires an array of permits, among them a contingency plan that includes how the company would respond to a blowout.

The locations of the company’s two planned wells are 10 and 15 miles, respectively, from the Yukon River and the village of Birch Creek, according to the permitting documents. The sites will be supported by a worker camp staffed 24 hours a day.

The area is along a lower branch of Birch Creek and is accessible only by barge, helicopter or skiff, depending on water levels. Schutt said the work will leave a light footprint.

“If there’s no further development, those lands will be indistinguishable from the lands next door in 10 years,” he said.

A stretch of Birch Creek above where Hilcorp’s summer wells are planned. (Craig McCaa/BLM Alaska)

Opponents of the plan have focused their efforts on a pending Hilcorp request to state land managers to pump water from Birch Creek and a nearby lake for its drilling operation.

The company says it will take a maximum of half of one cubic foot per second from the creek, which it describes as 0.05% of its flow. Ten different tribal groups have objected, according to their comment letters released by regulators in response to a Northern Journal public records request.

Allowing Hilcorp’s proposed withdrawal “would degrade water quality and jeopardize the ecological integrity of Birch Creek,” said one comment letter, from the Yukon River Inter-Tribal Watershed Council.

“We, the Indigenous Tribes and First Nations from the headwaters to the mouth of the Yukon River, urge the department to join us and put all of our future generations first,” the letter said.

If Hilcorp finds oil, the discovery would likely be just the start of more intense environmental battles to come.

Given the large cost of building a new oil field, construction would only make financial sense if it contained at least 200 million barrels of oil, according to Doyon’s estimates. Tying a development into the trans-Alaska pipeline would entail crossing federal land and require environmental permits that would face stiff opposition.

But for Doyon, the effort is worthwhile because of its big upside, according to Schutt. The company is already invested in the oil and gas industry; it owns a drilling subsidiary that maintains some of the largest rigs on the North Slope.

A new field in the Yukon Flats could produce a “massive royalty check” each year, much of which would be shared with Alaska’s other Native corporations under federal law, according to Schutt. Doyon’s subsidiaries would be in line for contracts to work on the development, he added, and Yukon Flats villages likely could save money by tapping into newly available natural gas for heating.

“It would economically support the whole subregion and Doyon for generations,” he said. “Those are the types of opportunities that don’t come along very often for us.”

Nathaniel Herz welcomes tips at natherz@gmail.com or (907) 793-0312. This article was originally published in Northern Journal, a newsletter from Herz. Subscribe at this link.

Trump administration says Alaska gas line investment could ward off tariffs

A man talks to reporters outside the White House
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent spoke to reporters outside the White House on April 9, 2025. (Screenshot from C-SPAN2)

If countries want to keep the Trump administration from imposing tariffs on their exports to the United States, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent suggests they invest in Alaska’s proposed Liquified Natural Gas project.

Bessent spoke Wednesday outside the White House, after President Trump announced he would pause reciprocal tariffs for 90 days to allow countries to negotiate. A reporter asked Bessent what it would take for a country to block the imposition of tariffs beyond three months.

That’s when Bessent raised the Alaska project as a possible deal-maker.

“These are trade negotiations, but if countries want to come and offer other things — so I talked about yesterday that we are thinking about a big LNG project in Alaska, that South Korea, Japan (and) Taiwan are interested in financing and taking a substantial portion of the off-take,” Bessent said.

A country’s investment and purchase of Alaska’s natural gas would help reduce its trade imbalance with the United States, he said.

The State of Alaska has tried for years to secure investment in the project, particularly from potential customers in Asia. Cost remains a high hurdle. It would take an estimated $44 billion or more to build an 800-mile pipeline from the North Slope to the Kenai Peninsula, with a processing plant at the north end and a liquefaction plant at the terminus. From there, LNG tankers would take the fuel across the Pacific.

Countries might have more incentive to invest in Alaska LNG with the threat of tariffs hanging over them. But Trump’s tariff announcements have caused global economic shocks, which could hinder investment in big projects.

Canadian company pushes forward with plans for new gold mine in Juneau

This is a map of showing the location of the proposed New Amalga Mine Project in Juneau. (Courtesy/Grande Portage Resources)

A Canadian company announced last week it’s starting multiple environmental studies to explore a possible new gold mine in Juneau. 

The announcement comes as the Trump administration pushes to ramp up mineral production in the U.S and as gold prices are seeing a historic surge in value.

The project is called the New Amalga Gold Deposit and it’s being led by Grande Portage Resources, a Vancouver-based mineral exploration company.

It was formerly called the Herbert Gold Project and it’s proposed to be located near Herbert Glacier, about 15 miles north of downtown Juneau. It lies within Juneau’s historic gold belt, an area that has produced millions of ounces of gold since it was discovered in the 1800s. 

Ian Klassen, the president and CEO of the company, says the studies are critical to advancing the project forward and making it “Alaska’s next great gold mine.”

“We’ve been excited about this project for a long, long time,” he said. “It’s one of the largest, richest undeveloped deposits around.”

Grande Portage has been drilling on federal mining claims in Tongass National Forest on and off since 2010 and it’s already completed five years’ worth of baseline environmental water studies. When the company first began drilling more than a decade ago, it faced pushback from local environmental groups and advocates.

Guy Archibald is the executive director of the Southeast Alaska Indigenous Transboundary Commission. He said the proposed mining project is still very conceptual and it’s difficult to know how impactful it could be on Juneau residents. 

“Mining is inherently destructive. What level of of damage is considered reasonable? Because federal law only bans unreasonable levels of damage,” he said. “What level here are they going to consider to be reasonable, and does that align with the people in Juneau’s vision for their particular environment. A lot remains to be seen here.”

Mining already plays a major role in Juneau socially and economically. The city has strong ties to the largest silver mine in the nation, Hecla Greens Creek Mine on Admiralty Island. There’s also Coeur Alaska Inc.’s Kensington Mine, a gold mine located about 45 miles north of town. 

While there are still many unknowns about the project, the company has begun to put conceptual plans in place. One involves sending the ore off-site to be processed at a third-party facility. That would allow it to operate while avoiding the need for chemical processing or tailings storage facilities at the site. Tailings are the ground-up rock that’s left over after the extraction of valuable metals like gold, zinc and silver. 

Last fall, the company also announced it had signed a letter of intent with local Alaska Native corporation Goldbelt Inc., to see if it could develop an ore terminal at Goldbelt’s property at Cascade Point. That area is beyond where the road ends in Juneau and is also where a new ferry terminal is proposed to be located. 

Archibald said that idea could come with its own set of issues.

“The tailings are going to go somewhere. May not be on the side of the Herbert River but they’re going to go somewhere,” he said. “You’re talking lots of truck traffic up and down the road, loading it, you know, on a barge to some mill somewhere else.”

Klassen, with Grande Portage Resources, said it’s hard to give a timeline for when the project may become a reality. Developing a mine would require state and federal permits and would also be subject to local review. 

“There’s years and years of development in terms of meeting all the different requirements that are presented by the state as well as the federal government,” he said. 

It’s also unclear if the company’s Canadian roots will become an issue as it pushes to develop the project in the U.S. Tension between the two countries is high following the Trump Administration’s long-promised tariffs on goods imported, including some Canadian imports, that took effect. The president has also called multiple times for the annexation of Canada.

Last month, mining leaders from Juneau and across the state said they had an optimistic outlook for resource development in Alaska under the new administration. On his first day in office, the president issued executive orders calling for more drilling, logging and mining in Alaska. One order aims to undo most of the Biden Administration’s work to limit resource development in the state.

Klassen said the company plans to do more outreach with the public as the project progresses. Last fall the company shared its proposed work schedule for 2025, which includes drilling approximately 15 holes to test the mineralized structure of multiple veins.

State approves confidential deal with developer to move gasline project forward

Alaska Gasline Development Corp. President Frank Richards addresses board members during a special meeting on Thursday, Mar. 27, 2025 from Tokyo, Japan. (Screenshot
from Alaska Gasline Development Corporation Zoom)

The Alaska LNG Project took a step forward Thursday. That’s when the board of the state-run Alaska Gasline Development Corp. authorized an agreement with Houston- and New York-based pipeline developer Glenfarne Group to shepherd the project to a final investment decision.

“We’ve been burning the midnight oil to move forward and work on these definitive agreements with Glenfarne,” said AGDC President Frank Richards.

He called into Thursday’s special board meeting from Tokyo – the latest stop on his East Asian tour he’s on with Gov. Mike Dunleavy to promote the project.

Under the agreement, Glenfarne will own three-quarters of the $44 billion project. The state of Alaska will own the other quarter. That’s the same equity share the state had when the project was being led by ExxonMobil, BP and ConocoPhillips. A corporation spokesperson said AGDC is staying a part-owner to uphold its statutory obligations.

If it’s built, the Alaska LNG Project would move natural gas between the North Slope and Southcentral. The full project includes a gas treatment plant on the Slope, an 800-mile pipeline and a liquefaction and export facility in Nikiski.

As the new owner, Glenfarne’s first task will be to update the project’s existing cost estimate to 2025 dollars. AGDC estimates that work will cost around $150 million. A small piece – $4 million – is covered by an existing federal grant secured by U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski in 2023.

If the project ultimately doesn’t move forward, Glenfarne will be able to recoup as much as $50 million from a backstop OK’d by Alaska’s state-run development agency, the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority.

The agreement also says Glenfarne will prioritize the pipeline piece of the project before moving to later phases. That would let Alaska customers access gas before it’s available for export.

The Arctic treatment plant would likely be necessary to allow gas to start flowing from established fields like Prudhoe Bay and Point Thompson. But state officials say they’re optimistic gas from a forthcoming field developed by Great Bear Pantheon won’t require treatment before it’s sent south. The developer signed an agreement with the state last year, but the field has not yet started production.

“This really is a tremendous opportunity for the state, for the United States, for our allies, and we couldn’t be more thrilled to see the board vote in favor of this transaction,” Glenfarne CEO Brendan Duval told the AGDC board.

On a Thursday evening call with reporters, Dunleavy said Alaska is closer than ever to getting the pipeline project off the ground. But he says he understands if people still have doubts about its prospects.

“I was very skeptical for years on this project, and I’m not going to have a final celebration,” he said. “I’ll get excited when these guys go to (final investment decision). I’ll get excited when pipe is ordered. I’ll get excited when it’s welded. I’ll get excited when gas is going through it. I’ll really get excited when we flick on the switch and we’re guaranteed that Alaska gas. So I would just say, stay tuned.”

While in Asia, Richards and Dunleavy picked up a nonbinding letter of support for the project from Taiwan’s state-owned CPC Corporation. And though the letter is nonbinding, Richards says it’s a big step towards making the project a reality.

“Six million tons represents one train of the Alaska LNG,” he said. “So it’s significant for us, and that has then drawn significant interest in review by the other countries that we’re talking to.”

Richards said he and Dunleavy had also met with officials and energy companies in South Korea, Japan and Thailand.

But some have questioned the extent to which foreign interest is the result of tariff threats from the White House. Dunleavy says there are concerns about international trade. But he says there’s also demand for natural gas.

“Asian countries are needing gas,” he said. “The question is, where are they’re going to get it from? And Alaska, in many cases, is closer to them, and we believe it could be delivered at a price that works better than other locales.

Though Thursday’s decision is a step forward, it’s still unclear whether enough investors will sign on for the project to be built.

State LNG project gets non-binding support letter from Taiwan

Gov. Mike Dunleavy (second from left) and Alaska Gasline Development Corporation President Frank Richards (third from left) celebrate a letter of intent from Taiwanese CPC Corporation for the Alaska LNG Project. (Courtesy photo/Alaska Gasline Development Corporation)

The $44 billion Alaska LNG Project picked up a letter of intent last Thursday from Taiwan’s state-owned CPC Corporation. The letter is non-binding. But project officials say it’s a first step toward a binding agreement to buy gas from the project if it’s built.

In a joint press conference with Gov. Mike Dunleavy, Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te said Alaska gas is conveniently located and a source of high-quality natural gas. In a press release, CPC Corporation said Alaska would become Taiwan’s closest source of natural gas if the project is built.

“We are very interested in buying Alaska natural gas because it can meet our needs and ensure our energy security,” Ching-te said.

Gov. Mike Dunleavy called Alaska LNG the state’s flagship project. And he said it’s more than just an energy initiative.

“It is a bridge connecting the future prosperity of both Alaska and Taiwan,” he said.

If it’s built, the Alaska LNG Project would move natural gas from the North Slope to Southcentral for shipment overseas. The project includes a treatment plant on the Slope, an 800-mile pipeline and a liquefaction facility in Nikiski.

President Trump has been a vocal supporter of the project. As reported by the New York Times, some say recent foreign interest is a result of tariff threats from the White House.

Last month, Trump announced a joint venture with Japan for the project, although that did not include a letter of intent. And after Dunleavy visited the Philippines last month, the country’s ambassador to the U.S. said they plan to procure natural gas from Alaska.

To date, no company has signed firm agreements to buy gas from the project. And the state corporation that owns the project declined to provide details about existing letters of intent, including who has signed them and how many there are.

Dunleavy is still in Asia to promote the project and seek investors. His office was not able to provide the trip itinerary. But Reuters reports Dunleavy met with government officials and companies in South Korea on Tuesday. He’s traveling with officials from Glenfarne. That’s the company in talks to take over the project from the Alaska Gasline Development Corporation.

Alaska wins lawsuit that could open Arctic refuge to oil exploration

Research biologists pause among the wetlands of the coastal plain, with the Brooks Range in the background. (Lisa Hupp/USFWS)

A federal judge in Anchorage has ruled in favor of Alaska’s state-owned investment bank in a lawsuit that could clear the way for oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

In an order published Tuesday, Judge Sharon Gleason wrote that the U.S. Department of the Interior acted illegally when it canceled oil and gas leases held by the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority on land within the refuge.

“Having reviewed the parties’ arguments, the court concludes that DOI was required to obtain a court order before canceling AIDEA’s leases,” Gleason said in her 22-page decision.

AIDEA did not immediately respond to a request for comment, but Cori Mills, Alaska’s deputy attorney general, called the decision a victory.

“The state looks forward to working with the current federal administration on fully realizing the vast potential of ANWR to grow Alaska’s economy and help America’s energy independence,” she said by email. “It is unfortunate we have lost a significant amount of time litigating, instead of moving forward with field studies and development. We will continue to review the decision in more detail but it’s definitely a victory.”

Tuesday’s order was the result of a lawsuit filed by AIDEA against the federal government last year, when the Biden administration canceled oil and gas leases that AIDEA won in a January 2021 sale.

Two other companies also won leases during the sale but later surrendered them to the federal government, leaving AIDEA as the only company holding leases within the refuge’s coastal plain, which is believed to hold significant oil and gas reserves, just as nearby state land does.

The Biden administration claimed that the sale — conducted under the auspices of the first Trump administration — was flawed and thus illegal.

It first suspended, then canceled the leases, prompting AIDEA to sue in 2024.

Gleason had upheld the Biden administration’s suspension order, but when it came to the cancellation, she ruled in AIDEA’s favor, citing a provision of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that enabled the ANWR leases.

That act said in part that the Interior Department “shall manage the oil and gas program on the Coastal Plain in a manner similar to the administration of lease sales under the Naval Petroleum Reserves Production Act of 1976.”

Gleason wrote: “Among the NPRPA’s implementing regulations is a regulation that provides that ‘(p)roducing leases or leases known to contain valuable deposits of oil or gas may be canceled only by court order.’”

But the Interior Department didn’t obtain a court order, Gleason noted.

“Accordingly, federal defendants’ cancellation of AIDEA’s leases was not in accordance with law because it failed to seek a court order,” she wrote.

Several environmental and tribal groups sided with the federal government during the course of the lawsuit and had requested the ability to offer alternative solutions if Gleason ruled in favor of AIDEA.

She turned them down, writing, “DOI’s error is serious: DOI cancelled AIDEA’s leases without following the congressionally mandated procedure for doing so.”

In light of that finding, she vacated the department’s lease cancellation decision, saying the department — now back in the hands of the Trump administration — may decide what to do next.

In a statement released last week, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said he intends to open the refuge’s entire 1.56 million-acre coastal plain to development, indicating that AIDEA will be given a free hand on its leases.

For its part, AIDEA has said in multiple court filings that if allowed to proceed, it will conduct seismic testing and other preliminary work necessary to determine how much oil and gas lies within its leases.

Among the various environmental and tribal groups that stood with the federal government in opposition to AIDEA was the Gwich’in Steering Committee, represented by attorneys from Trustees for Alaska.

“This disappointing ruling ignores the destruction oil drilling will do to our communities and only deepens our resolve in fiercely defending the coastal plain from oil and gas extraction,” said Kristen Moreland, executive director of the Gwich’in Steering Committee. “We will always protect the caribou, our way of life, and future generations.”

The Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government, Arctic Village Council, and Venetie Village Council, represented by the Native American Rights Fund, said in a statement that they will continue to oppose drilling in ANWR and that “multiple legal and administrative pathways remain to ensure proper environmental review before any ground-disturbing activities could occur.”

Site notifications
Update notification options
Subscribe to notifications